You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nontarget effects on songbirds from habitat manipulation for Greater Sage-Grouse: Implications for the umbrella species concept
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ornithological Applications, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1650/condor-17-200.1 |
Authors |
Jason D. Carlisle, Anna D. Chalfoun, Kurt T. Smith, Jeffrey L. Beck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 9% |
Spain | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Morocco | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 15 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 47% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#832,093
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#77
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,403
of 338,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.