↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a Social Marketing Campaign Promoting Use of a Sexual Health Text Service by Teens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Communication, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of a Social Marketing Campaign Promoting Use of a Sexual Health Text Service by Teens
Published in
Journal of Health Communication, May 2015
DOI 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018586
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sexual health text message services are becoming an increasingly popular way to provide adolescents with accurate sexual health information, but promotion of such services is often limited. This study uses three quantitative methods (service use data, a text message-based questionnaire, and an in-school online survey) to assess the effectiveness of an in-school social marketing campaign promoting a sexual health text message service that connects teens directly with a health educator. The 3-month campaign was associated with increased service use, but use was still relatively low. Follow-up qualitative work that included focus groups and interviews found a number of barriers to use. Teens indicated they did not have sexual health questions, did not think of the service, or were unsure how to use it. Teens also brought up additional barriers such as concern over parents seeing the messages. Implications for text message service providers and health educators are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 10%
Psychology 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,411,569
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#1,181
of 1,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,626
of 266,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#48
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.