↓ Skip to main content

Emerging Treatment Paradigms in Radiation Oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
13 patents

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emerging Treatment Paradigms in Radiation Oncology
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1191
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rapid advancements in radiotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies have resulted in the development of potential paradigm-shifting use of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer. In this review, we will discuss some of the most promising therapeutic approaches in the field of radiation oncology. These strategies include the use of highly targeted stereotactic radiotherapy and particle therapy as well as combining radiotherapy with agents that modulate the DNA damage response, augment the immune response, or protect normal tissues.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 23 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2025.
All research outputs
#2,943,394
of 33,493,714 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,508
of 17,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,968
of 297,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#33
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,493,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.