↓ Skip to main content

Postediting machine translation output: subject-matter experts versus professional translators

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Postediting machine translation output: subject-matter experts versus professional translators
Published in
Perspectives, March 2016
DOI 10.1080/0907676x.2015.1119862
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 16 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 41 39%
Arts and Humanities 19 18%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Computer Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#21,901,584
of 27,759,874 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives
#3
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,282
of 316,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,759,874 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.