↓ Skip to main content

Intraventricular extension of an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is an independent predictor of a worse functional outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intraventricular extension of an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is an independent predictor of a worse functional outcome
Published in
Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.032
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the impact of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) on the cognitive prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to ruptured cerebral aneurysm, independent of the presence of intraparenchymal hemorrhage, hydrocephalus or vasospasm. A Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients with aneurysmal SAH from July 2009 to November 2016 was performed. Patients were included if they had a saccular aneurysm with a Hunt-Hess grade (HHG) 1-3. Those who underwent craniectomy/clipping and those with vasospasm were excluded. Patients with IVH were grouped into 5 groups depending on the blood distribution in the ventricles. Functional outcomes studied were modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-2, cognitive impairment and memory impairment, and the presence of amnesia to the event. A univariate followed by a multivariate analysis ware performed. A total of 443 patients were identified and 124 patients met the criterion. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with mRS of 0-2 between patients with IVH and those without IVH but with EVD (external ventricular drain). There was a higher proportion of cognitive deficits in patients with IVH (71.95%), compared to those without (31.58%; p = 0.01). Patients with IVH had a higher rate of anterograde amnesia (100% vs. 4.3% p < 0.0001), lower rate of mRS 0-2 (78% vs 100% p < 0.001), and higher rate of cognitive impairment (71.9% vs. 13% p < 0.0001) compared with those who did not require an EVD. Grade 3 and grade 4 were shown to have lower rate of patients with mRS 0-2 and a higher rate of cognitive impairment. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of cognitive and memory impairment were increasing HHG (OR = 155.33; P < 0.01), ACOM/A1/ACA/anterior choroidal aneurysms, (OR = 5.24; P = 0.04), increasing Fischer scale (OR = 6.93; P = 0.01), and increasing IVH grade (OR = 6.9; P = 0.01). Only worse HHG (OR = 2704.22; P = 0.01) and IVH grade 2-4 were associated (perfect predictor, OR cannot be extracted) with anterograde amnesia. IVH is an independent prognosticator of SAH cognitive outcomes. The effect of IVH drainage and other intraventricular therapies on SAH course is an attractive topic for further investigation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Librarian 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Psychology 2 4%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 21 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#24,787,356
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery
#1,538
of 2,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,651
of 369,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,536 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.