↓ Skip to main content

日本博物誌雑話(5)

Overview of attention for article published in Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本博物誌雑話(5)
Published in
Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, August 1999
DOI 10.19004/taxa.7.0_6
Authors

磯野 直秀

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#101
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,215
of 34,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.