↓ Skip to main content

Is level of intuitive eating associated with plate size effects?

Overview of attention for article published in Eating Behaviors, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Is level of intuitive eating associated with plate size effects?
Published in
Eating Behaviors, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Intuitive eating is an eating approach that emphasizes increased focus on internal hunger and fullness cues to regulate eating behavior; thus, successful intuitive eating should curb the influence of environmental factors such as plate and portion size on consumption. The current study examined whether self-reported levels of intuitive eating moderated the influence of portion size on college students' food consumption during an afternoon meal of pasta and tomato sauce. Participants (N=137, 63.5% female) were randomly assigned to either a large plate (12-inch) or small plate (8-inch) external cue condition. All participants fasted for four daytime hours, completed the Intuitive Eating Scale, and then were asked to rate a meal of pasta and tomato sauce on different dimensions of taste. Participants were told that they could eat as much pasta as they would like. Higher levels of intuitive eating were associated with greater food consumption. At the mean level of intuitive eating, participants ate more pasta in the large plate condition. Furthermore, the influence of plate size on food consumption increased as levels of intuitive eating increased. Individuals who report high levels of intuitive eating may be more likely to eat an objectively larger amount of food in a permissive food environment, and may have implications for eating approaches that promote eating in response to internal hunger and fullness cues.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 49 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,199,912
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Eating Behaviors
#74
of 992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,887
of 280,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating Behaviors
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.