↓ Skip to main content

A case of small intestinal perforation caused by a tip of a broken metal endotracheal tube stylet

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case of small intestinal perforation caused by a tip of a broken metal endotracheal tube stylet
Published in
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2009
DOI 10.3919/jjsa.70.3330
Authors

Kuniaki HIRABAYASHI, Keisuke TOGUTI, Kenji YOSHIKAWA, Takuya YAMAGUCHI, Kouji HAZANO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#88
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,101
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.