↓ Skip to main content

Basic biology and therapeutic implications of lncRNA

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Basic biology and therapeutic implications of lncRNA
Published in
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA), a class of non-coding RNA molecules recently identified largely due to the efforts of FANTOM, and later GENCODE and ENCODE consortia, have been a subject of intense investigation in the past decade. Extensive efforts to get deeper understanding of lncRNA biology have yielded evidence of their diverse structural and regulatory roles in protecting chromosome integrity, maintaining genomic architecture, X chromosome inactivation, imprinting, transcription, translation and epigenetic regulation. Here we wil briefly review the recent studies in the field of lncRNA biology focusing mostly on mammalian species and discuss their therapeutic implications.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 54 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 58 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#2,943
of 3,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,201
of 280,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
#30
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.