↓ Skip to main content

Melissa officinalis L. decoctions as functional beverages: a bioactive approach and chemical characterization

Overview of attention for article published in Food & Function, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melissa officinalis L. decoctions as functional beverages: a bioactive approach and chemical characterization
Published in
Food & Function, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c5fo00309a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Márcio Carocho, Lillian Barros, Ricardo C. Calhelha, Ana Ćirić, Marina Soković, Celestino Santos-Buelga, Patricia Morales, Isabel C. F. R. Ferreira

Abstract

Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) is a member of the Lamiaceae family with a long story of human consumption. It has been consumed for decades, directly in food and as a decoction or an infusion for its medicinal purposes. In this manuscript, a detailed chemical characterization of the decoction of this plant is described, encompassing antimicrobial, antioxidant and antitumor activities. Rosmarinic acid and lithospermic acid A were the most abundant phenolic compounds. Quinic acid, fructose, glucose and γ-tocopherol were the most abundant within their groups of molecules. M. officinalis decoctions were active against a wide range of microorganisms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium, and Penicillium funiculosum being the most sensitive bacteria and fungi, respectively. The growth inhibition of different human tumor cell lines (mainly MCF-7 and HepG2) was also observed, as also high free radical scavenging activity and reducing power. This manuscript highlights some beneficial effects of these functional beverages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Chemistry 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Food & Function
#1,818
of 4,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,138
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food & Function
#108
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.