↓ Skip to main content

The effects of herbivory on neighbor interactions along a coastal marsh gradient

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Botany, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of herbivory on neighbor interactions along a coastal marsh gradient
Published in
American Journal of Botany, May 1997
DOI 10.2307/2445907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine L. Taylor, James B. Grace, Brian D. Marx

Abstract

Many current theories of community function are based on the assumption that disturbances such as herbivory act to reduce the importance of neighbor interactions among plants. In this study, we examined the effects of herbivory (primarily by nutria, Myocastor coypus) on neighbor interactions between three dominant grasses in three coastal marsh communities, fresh, oligohaline, and mesohaline. The grasses studied were Panicum virgatum, Spartina patens, and Spartina alterniflora, which are dominant species in the fresh, oligohaline, and mesohaline marshes, respectively. Additive mixtures and monocultures of transplants were used in conjunction with exclosure fences to determine the impact of herbivory on neighbor interactions in the different marsh types. Herbivory had a strong effect on all three species and was important in all three marshes. In the absence of herbivores, the impact of neighbors was significant for two of the species (Panicum virgatum and Spartina patens) and varied considerably between environments, with competition intensifying for Panicum virgatum and decreasing for Spartina patens with increasing salinity. Indications of positive neighbor effects (mutualisms) were observed for both of these species, though in contrasting habitats and to differing degrees. In the presence of herbivores, however, competitive and positive effects were eliminated. Overall, then, it was observed that in this case, intense herbivory was able to override other biotic interactions such as competition and mutualism, which were not detectable in the presence of herbivores.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
Israel 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 32%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 51%
Environmental Science 13 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Botany
#1,919
of 4,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,550
of 29,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Botany
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.