↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impaired modulation of postjunctional α1‐ but not α2‐adrenergic vasoconstriction in contracting forearm muscle of postmenopausal women
Published in
Journal of Physiology, May 2018
DOI 10.1113/jp275777
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Contraction mediated blunting of postjunctional α-adrenergic vasoconstriction (functional sympatholysis) is attenuated in older males; however, direct confirmation of this effect remains unknown in postmenopausal women (PMW). The present study examined whether PMW exhibit augmented postjunctional α-adrenergic receptor vasoconstriction at rest and during forearm exercise compared to young women (YW). Eight YW (24 ± 1 yrs) and eight PMW (65 ± 1 yrs) completed a series of randomized experimental trials; 1) at rest 2) under high flow (adenosine infusion) conditions and 3) during 6-minutes of forearm exercise at relative (20% of maximum (MVC) and absolute (7 kg) intensities. Phenylephrine (α1 -agonist) or dexmedetomidine (α2 -agonist) was administered during the last 3-minutes of each trial to elicit α-adrenergic vasoconstriction. Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated from blood flow and blood pressure. Vasoconstrictor responsiveness was identified as the change in FVC (%) during α-adrenergic agonist infusions from baseline (resting trial) or from steady-state conditions (high flow and exercise trials). During resting and high-flow trials, the %FVC during α1 - and α2 -agonist stimulation was similar between YW and PMW. During exercise, α1 -mediated vasoconstriction was blunted in YW vs. PMW at relative (-6 ± 2% vs. -15 ± 3%) and absolute (-4 ± 2% vs. -14 ± 5%) workloads, such that blood flow and FVC were lower in PMW (P<0.05 for all). Conversely, α2 -mediated vasoconstriction was similar between YW and PMW at relative (-22 ± 3% vs. -22 ± 4%; P>0.05) and absolute (-19 ± 3% vs. -18 ± 4%; P>0.05) workloads. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that despite similar α-adrenergic vasoconstrictor responsiveness at rest, PMW have a decreased ability to attenuate α1 -adrenergic vasoconstriction in contracting skeletal muscle. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 26 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 27 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#11,825,413
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology
#4,854
of 12,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,234
of 375,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology
#82
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.