↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Demonstration of Nucleoside Transporter Activity in the Nose-to-Brain Distribution of [18F]Fluorothymidine Using PET Imaging
Published in
The AAPS Journal, December 2017
DOI 10.1208/s12248-017-0158-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the role of nucleoside transporters in the nose-to-brain uptake of [18F]fluorothymidine (FLT), an equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT1,2) and concentrative nucleoside transporter (CNT1-3) substrate, using PET to measure local tissue concentrations. Anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats were administered FLT by intranasal (IN) instillation or tail-vein injection (IV). NBMPR (nitrobenzylmercaptopurine riboside), an ENT1 inhibitor, was administered either IN or intraperitoneally (IP). Dynamic PET imaging was performed for up to 40 min. A CT was obtained for anatomical co-registration and attenuation correction. Time-activity curves (TACs) were generated for the olfactory bulb (OB) and remaining brain, and the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for each TAC was calculated to determine the total tissue exposure of FLT. FLT concentrations were higher in the OB than in the rest of the brain following IN administration. IP administration of NBMPR resulted in increased OB and brain FLT exposure following both IN and IV administration, suggesting that NBMPR decreases the clearance rate of FLT from the brain. When FLT and NBMPR were co-administered IN, there was a decrease in the OB AUC while an increase in the brain AUC was observed. The decrease in OB exposure was likely the result of inhibition of ENT1 uptake activity in the nose-to-brain transport pathway. FLT distribution patterns show that nucleoside transporters, including ENT1, play a key role in the distribution of transporter substrates between the nasal cavity and the brain via the OB.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Chemistry 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#22,698,249
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#715
of 817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,569
of 454,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.