The limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) are a group of muscular dystrophies that share a similar clinical phenotype. Despite this clinical homogeneity, at least 15 different genetic forms of LGMD are now known. Some of these share pathogenetic mechanisms with other forms of muscular dystrophy, such as the sarcoglycanopathies (LGMD 2C-F) and the dystrophinopathies (Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy). Some are allelic with other forms of muscular dystrophy; LGMD 1B is allelic with autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Still others introduce totally unique pathogenetic mechanisms to the study of muscular dystrophy. For example, LGMD 2H appears to be due to mutations affecting the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. A diagnostic approach is outlined based on clinical features, genetics, and commercially available testing.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
3%
Nursing and Health Professions
1
3%
Other
3
8%
Unknown
18
45%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2026.
All research outputs
#3,034,331
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#167
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,560
of 191,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them
