The current study examines the relationship between therapist interpretations in the early stages of psychodynamic psychotherapy and subsequent outcomes for 76 outpatients. Pre-treatment characteristics of global symptomatology, personality pathology, insight, and level of object relations were examined as possible significant patient characteristics. Independent clinicians reliably rated therapist use of interpretations over two early treatment sessions (third and ninth). Patient-rated alliance was also examined as a possible psychotherapy process predictor of change. Therapy outcomes were measured based on patients' changes in global symptomatology and estimates of improvement across a broad range of functioning at the end of treatment. An examination of the study independent variables revealed significant relationships between pre-treatment personality disorder symptomatology with patient object relations (OR), patient OR with pre-treatment insight, and pre-treatment insight with use of therapist interpretation. Pre-treatment symptomatology and early treatment interpretations predicted reliable change in global symptomatology. Patients' estimates of improvement across a broad band of functioning were most significantly impacted by quality of alliance. Analysis of these outcome relationships controlled for therapist effects. Statistical implications of therapist effects are discussed in regard to this area of research and future directions for investigation are explored.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#24,122,808
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#2,390
of 3,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,361
of 308,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#44
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
