↓ Skip to main content

World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 3,473)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
81 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12630-018-1111-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 96 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 106 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#490,953
of 34,410,252 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#20
of 3,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,416
of 372,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,252 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.