↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
662 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A massive phytoplankton bloom induced by an ecosystem-scale iron fertilization experiment in the equatorial Pacific Ocean
Published in
Nature, October 1996
DOI 10.1038/383495a0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The seeding of an expanse of surface waters in the equatorial Pacific Ocean with low concentrations of dissolved iron triggered a massive phytoplankton bloom which consumed large quantities of carbon dioxide and nitrate that these microscopic plants cannot fully utilize under natural conditions. These and other observations provide unequivocal support for the hypothesis that phytoplankton growth in this oceanic region is limited by iron bioavailability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 621 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 151 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 20%
Student > Master 76 11%
Student > Bachelor 75 11%
Professor 29 4%
Other 93 14%
Unknown 106 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 175 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 22%
Environmental Science 130 20%
Chemistry 27 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 4%
Other 37 6%
Unknown 126 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,306,604
of 34,297,879 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,456
of 117,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406
of 39,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#8
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.