↓ Skip to main content

Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Chronic Renal Disease: Is It Worth the Risk?

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Chronic Renal Disease: Is It Worth the Risk?
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.037
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

26-27% of patients with end stage hip and knee arthritis requiring TJR have chronic renal disease. A multi-center, prospective clinical registry was queried for TJA's from 2006 to 2012, and 74,300 cases were analyzed. Renal impairment was quantified using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to stratify each patient by stage of CRD (1-5). There was a significantly greater rate of overall complications in patients with moderate to severe CRD (6.1% vs. 7.6%, P<0.001). In those with CRD (Stage 3-5), mortality was twice as high (0.26% vs. 0.48%, P<0.001). Patients with Stage 4 and 5 CRD had a 213% increased risk of any complication (OR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.73-2.62). Surgeons may use these findings to discuss the risk-benefit ratio of elective TJR in patients with CRD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 47%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 30 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#3,920
of 4,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,453
of 281,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#70
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.