| Title |
A Combinatorial Lipid Code Shapes the Electrostatic Landscape of Plant Endomembranes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Developmental Cell, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.04.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Membrane surface charge is critical for the transient, yet specific recruitment of proteins with polybasic regions to certain organelles. In eukaryotes, the plasma membrane (PM) is the most electronegative compartment of the cell, which specifies its identity. As such, membrane electrostatics is a central parameter in signaling, intracellular trafficking, and polarity. Here, we explore which are the lipids that control membrane electrostatics using plants as a model. We show that phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P), phosphatidic acidic (PA), and phosphatidylserine (PS) are separately required to generate the electrostatic signature of the plant PM. In addition, we reveal the existence of an electrostatic territory that is organized as a gradient along the endocytic pathway and is controlled by PS/PI4P combination. Altogether, we propose that combinatorial lipid composition of the cytosolic leaflet of organelles not only defines the electrostatic territory but also distinguishes different functional compartments within this territory by specifying their varying surface charges. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 17% |
| France | 4 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Denmark | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Czechia | 2 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 57% |
| Scientists | 11 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 68 | 37% |