↓ Skip to main content

A meta-analytic review of the relationship between family accommodation and OCD symptom severity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anxiety Disorders, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A meta-analytic review of the relationship between family accommodation and OCD symptom severity
Published in
Journal of Anxiety Disorders, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Accommodation of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms by family members is common. This paper presents a systematic meta-analytic review on family accommodation and OCD symptom severity. Fourteen studies investigating the relationship between family accommodation and OCD symptoms were selected. The medium effect size of the relationship between family accommodation and OCD symptom severity was significant (r=.35; 95% CI: .23 to .47), based on a Hunter-Schmidt random effects model with a total of 849 participants. Although there was some evidence of publication bias, Rosenthal's fail-safe N suggested that 596 studies with zero effect would be needed to reduce the mean effect size to non-significant. Findings are discussed in the context of the limitations of the studies, and in particular the reliance on cross-sectional designs which impede causal conclusions. Future research to evaluate a family accommodation intervention in a randomized controlled design and using mediation analysis to explore change mechanisms is called for.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 46 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 51 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anxiety Disorders
#1,212
of 1,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,370
of 282,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anxiety Disorders
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.