↓ Skip to main content

Operative complications and differences in outcome after clipping and coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgery, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Operative complications and differences in outcome after clipping and coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgery, June 2015
DOI 10.3171/2014.11.jns141607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 38 28%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 55%
Neuroscience 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,844,025
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery
#743
of 8,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,242
of 307,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery
#13
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.