| Title |
Models based on ultraviolet spectroscopy, polyphenols, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides for prediction of wine astringency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Chemistry, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Claude Boulet, Corinne Trarieux, Jean-Marc Souquet, Maris-Agnés Ducasse, Soline Caillé, Alain Samson, Pascale Williams, Thierry Doco, Véronique Cheynier |
| Abstract |
Astringency elicited by tannins is usually assessed by tasting. Alternative methods involving tannin precipitation have been proposed, but they remain time-consuming. Our goal was to propose a faster method and investigate the links between wine composition and astringency. Red wines covering a wide range of astringency intensities, assessed by sensory analysis, were selected. Prediction models based on multiple linear regression (MLR) were built using UV spectrophotometry (190-400nm) and chemical analysis (enological analysis, polyphenols, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides). Astringency intensity was strongly correlated (R(2)=0.825) with tannin precipitation by bovine serum albumin (BSA). Wine absorbances at 230nm (A230) proved more suitable for astringency prediction (R(2)=0.705) than A280 (R(2)=0.56) or tannin concentration estimated by phloroglucinolysis (R(2)=0.59). Three variable models built with A230, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides presented high R(2) and low errors of cross-validation. These models confirmed that polysaccharides decrease astringency perception and indicated a positive relationship between oligosaccharides and astringency. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 40% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |