↓ Skip to main content

STOPPING TIME: The Genetics of Fly and Mouse Circadian Clocks

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Neuroscience, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
STOPPING TIME: The Genetics of Fly and Mouse Circadian Clocks
Published in
Annual Review of Neuroscience, March 2001
DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1091
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Forward genetic analyses in flies and mice have uncovered conserved transcriptional feedback loops at the heart of circadian pacemakers. Conserved mechanisms of posttranslational regulation, most notably phosphorylation, appear to be important for timing feedback. Transcript analyses have indicated that circadian clocks are not restricted to neurons but are found in several tissues. Comparisons between flies and mice highlight important differences in molecular circuitry and circadian organization. Future studies of pacemaker mechanisms and their control of physiology and behavior will likely continue to rely on forward genetics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Mexico 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 190 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Researcher 33 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Master 18 9%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 13%
Neuroscience 22 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 37 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,492,877
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Neuroscience
#197
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,610
of 61,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Neuroscience
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.