↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
24 patents

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences
Published in
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, November 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0924-8579(03)00180-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Domesticated animals have a large variety of antimicrobial peptides that serve as natural innate barriers limiting microbial infection or, in some instances, act as an integral component in response to inflammation or microbial infection. These peptides differ in size, composition, mechanisms of activity and range of antimicrobial specificities. They are expressed in many tissues, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, macrophages and mucosal epithelial cells. There is a small group of anionic antimicrobial peptides found in ruminants and a much larger group of cationic antimicrobial peptides found in all domesticated animals. The cationic peptides include linear, helical peptides, linear peptides rich in proline and cysteine-stabilized peptides with a beta-sheet and are commonly referred to as cathelicidins and defensins. These peptides are generally broad-spectrum for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi (e.g. myeloid antimicrobial peptides, alpha-, beta-defensins, and protegrins) or are specific to one of these groups (e.g. porcine cecropin P1, Bac5, Bac7, PR-39 and prophenin).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 4 1%
India 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 353 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 24%
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 66 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 13%
Chemistry 34 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 5%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 79 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2025.
All research outputs
#3,721,517
of 34,043,423 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#504
of 3,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,070
of 80,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,043,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.