↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reliability of 7T 1H‐MRS measured human prefrontal cortex glutamate, glutamine, and glutathione signals using an adapted echo time optimized PRESS sequence: A between‐ and within‐sessions investigation
Published in
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/jmri.24970
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To ascertain the mechanisms of neuropsychiatric illnesses and their treatment, accurate and reliable imaging techniques are required; proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1) H-MRS) can noninvasively measure glutamatergic function. Evidence suggests that aberrant glutamatergic signaling plays a role in numerous psychopathologies. Until recently, overlapping glutamatergic signals (glutamate, glutamine, and glutathione) could not easily be separated. However, the advent of novel pulse sequences and higher field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows more precise resolution of overlapping glutamatergic signals, although the question of signal reliability remains undetermined. At 7T MR, we acquired (1) H-MRS data from the medial pregenual anterior cingulate cortex of healthy volunteers (n = 26) twice on two separate days. An adapted echo time optimized point-resolved spectroscopy sequence, modified with the addition of a J-suppression pulse to attenuate N-acetyl-aspartate multiplet signals at 2.49 ppm, was used to excite and acquire the spectra. In-house software was used to model glutamate, glutamine, and glutathione, among other metabolites, referenced to creatine. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed for within- and between-session measurements. Within-session measurements of glutamate, glutamine, and glutathione were on average reliable (ICCs ≥0.7). As anticipated, ICCs for between-session values of glutamate, glutamine, and glutathione were slightly lower but nevertheless reliable (ICC >0.62). A negative correlation was observed between glutathione concentration and age (r(24)  = -0.37; P < 0.05), and a gender effect was noted on glutamine and glutathione. The adapted sequence provides good reliability to measure glutamate, glutamine, and glutathione signals. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Psychology 7 12%
Physics and Astronomy 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#2,893
of 3,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,768
of 280,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#40
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,884 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.