↓ Skip to main content

Immunopathogenesis of coronavirus infections: implications for SARS

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Immunology, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
167 X users
patent
28 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunopathogenesis of coronavirus infections: implications for SARS
Published in
Nature Reviews Immunology, December 2005
DOI 10.1038/nri1732
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

At the end of 2002, the first cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) were reported, and in the following year, SARS resulted in considerable mortality and morbidity worldwide. SARS is caused by a novel species of coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and is the most severe coronavirus-mediated human disease that has been described so far. On the basis of similarities with other coronavirus infections, SARS might, in part, be immune mediated. As discussed in this Review, studies of animals that are infected with other coronaviruses indicate that excessive and sometimes dysregulated responses by macrophages and other pro-inflammatory cells might be particularly important in the pathogenesis of disease that is caused by infection with these viruses. It is hoped that lessons from such studies will help us to understand more about the pathogenesis of SARS in humans and to prevent or control outbreaks of SARS in the future.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 574 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 13%
Researcher 73 13%
Student > Bachelor 63 11%
Student > Master 58 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 101 17%
Unknown 180 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 79 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 2%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 195 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2026.
All research outputs
#349,410
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#153
of 3,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#669
of 219,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.