↓ Skip to main content

PLANNED FLOODING AND COLORADO RIVER RIPARIAN TRADE‐OFFS DOWNSTREAM FROM GLEN CANYON DAM, ARIZONA

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PLANNED FLOODING AND COLORADO RIVER RIPARIAN TRADE‐OFFS DOWNSTREAM FROM GLEN CANYON DAM, ARIZONA
Published in
Ecological Applications, June 2001
DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0701:pfacrr]2.0.co;2
Authors

Lawrence E. Stevens, Tina J. Ayers, Jeffery B. Bennett, Kerry Christensen, Michael J. C. Kearsley, Vicky J. Meretsky, Arthur M. Phillips, Roderic A. Parnell, John Spence, Mark K. Sogge, Abraham E. Springer, David L. Wegner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 28%
Design 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,271
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,014
of 41,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them