↓ Skip to main content

TFIID can be rate limiting in vivo for TATA-containing, but not TATA-lacking, RNA polymerase II promoters.

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TFIID can be rate limiting in vivo for TATA-containing, but not TATA-lacking, RNA polymerase II promoters.
Published in
Genes & Development, February 1992
DOI 10.1101/gad.6.2.304
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have studied the effect of exogenous expression of the basal transcription factor TFIID on the activities of several different TATA-containing and TATA-lacking promoters. Overexpression of TFIID from a transfected plasmid in Drosophila Schneider cells resulted in substantial concentration-dependent increases in expression from a cotransfected minimal TATA-containing promoter. Overexpression of TFIID activated expression from all TATA-containing promoters tested, with the maximum level of activation being inversely proportional to the strength of the promoter. In contrast, expression from TATA-less promoters was not enhanced, and could in fact be reduced, by increased expression of TFIID. Consistent with these findings overexpression of TFIID had opposite effects on Sp1-mediated activation observed from minimal synthetic promoters consisting of Sp1-binding sites and either a TATA box or initiator element. We discuss the significance of these results in terms of the role of TFIID in the initiation of transcription and as a possible regulatory target for expression from TATA-containing promoters, as well as the role TFIID may play in expression from TATA-less promoters.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 1998.
All research outputs
#7,556,753
of 23,050,116 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#3,155
of 5,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,589
of 61,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,050,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.