↓ Skip to main content

Bax-Deficient Mice with Lymphoid Hyperplasia and Male Germ Cell Death

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bax-Deficient Mice with Lymphoid Hyperplasia and Male Germ Cell Death
Published in
Science, October 1995
DOI 10.1126/science.270.5233.96
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

BAX, a heterodimeric partner of BCL2, counters BCL2 and promotes apoptosis in gain-of-function experiments. A Bax knockout mouse was generated that proved viable but displayed lineage-specific aberrations in cell death. Thymocytes and B cells in this mouse displayed hyperplasia, and Bax-deficient ovaries contained unusual atretic follicles with excess granulosa cells. In contrast, Bax-deficient males were infertile as a result of disordered seminiferous tubules with an accumulation of atypical premeiotic germ cells, but no mature haploid sperm. Multinucleated giant cells and dysplastic cells accompanied massive cell death. Thus, the loss of Bax results in hyperplasia or hypoplasia, depending on the cellular context.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Unknown 218 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 27%
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Master 17 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 7%
Professor 15 7%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 40 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 49 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,076,048
of 30,096,795 outputs
Outputs from Science
#39,224
of 89,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,236
of 27,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#59
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,096,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.