↓ Skip to main content

Toxicity of oral cadmium intake: Impact on gut immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicology Letters, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toxicity of oral cadmium intake: Impact on gut immunity
Published in
Toxicology Letters, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Ninkov, Aleksandra Popov Aleksandrov, Jelena Demenesku, Ivana Mirkov, Dina Mileusnic, Anja Petrovic, Ilijana Grigorov, Lidija Zolotarevski, Maja Tolinacki, Dragan Kataranovski, Ilija Brceski, Milena Kataranovski

Abstract

Gastrointestinal tract is one of the main targets of cadmium (Cd), an important food and drinking water contaminant. In the present study, the effect of subchronic (30 days) oral (in water) intake of 5ppm and 50ppm of cadmium on immune responses in the gut was examined in rats. Cadmium consumption resulted in reduction of bacteria corresponding to Lactobacillus strain, tissue damage and intestinal inflammation [increases in High Mobility Group Box1 (HMGB1 molecules), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activity and proinflammatory cytokine (TNF, IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-17) content]. Draining (mesenteric) lymph node (MLN) stress response was observed [elevation of MLN glutathione (GSH) and metallothionein (MT) mRNA levels] and stimulation of both adaptive [cellularity, proliferation, proinflammatory (IFN-γ and IL-17) MLN cell cytokine responses] as well as innate immune activity (increases in numbers of NK and CD68(+) cells, oxidative activities, IL-1β). In contrast to proinflammatory milieu in MLN, decreased or unchanged antiinflammatory IL-10 response was observed. Stimulation of immune activities of MLN cells have, most probably, resulted from sensing of cadmium-induced tissue injury, but also from bacterial antigens that breached compromised intestinal barrier. These effects of cadmium should be taken into account when assessing dietary cadmium as health risk factor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 30 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 35 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Toxicology Letters
#3,044
of 3,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,206
of 280,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicology Letters
#21
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,691 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.