↓ Skip to main content

Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Helices: Insights from Implicit Membrane Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Journal, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Helices: Insights from Implicit Membrane Modeling
Published in
Biophysical Journal, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.030
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sensing and generation of lipid membrane curvature, mediated by the binding of specific proteins onto the membrane surface, play crucial roles in cell biology. A number of mechanisms have been proposed, but the molecular understanding of these processes is incomplete. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations have offered valuable insights but are extremely demanding computationally. Implicit membrane simulations could provide a viable alternative, but current models apply only to planar membranes. In this work, the implicit membrane model 1 is extended to spherical and tubular membranes. The geometric change from planar to curved shapes is straightforward but insufficient for capturing the full curvature effect, which includes changes in lipid packing. Here, these packing effects are taken into account via the lateral pressure profile. The extended implicit membrane model 1 is tested on the wild-types and mutants of the antimicrobial peptide magainin, the ALPS motif of arfgap1, α-synuclein, and an ENTH domain. In these systems, the model is in qualitative agreement with experiments. We confirm that favorable electrostatic interactions tend to weaken curvature sensitivity in the presence of strong hydrophobic interactions but may actually have a positive effect when those are weak. We also find that binding to vesicles is more favorable than binding to tubes of the same diameter and that the long helix of α-synuclein tends to orient along the axis of tubes, whereas shorter helices tend to orient perpendicular to it. Adoption of a specific orientation could provide a mechanism for coupling protein oligomerization to tubule formation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 23%
Chemistry 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Physics and Astronomy 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,393,794
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Journal
#6,067
of 10,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,367
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Journal
#52
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.