↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analyzing Person, Situation and Person × Situation Interaction Effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations
Published in
Psychological Methods, January 2015
DOI 10.1037/met0000026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 24%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 63%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Methods
#508
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,172
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Methods
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.