↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
patent
183 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer transiently corrects the chloride transport defect in nasal epithelia of patients with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cell, October 1993
DOI 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80063-k
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the potential of direct transfer of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) cDNA for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF), we administered an E1-deficient adenovirus, encoding CFTR, to a defined area of nasal airway epithelium of three individuals with CF. This treatment corrected the Cl- transport defect that is characteristic of CF-affected epithelia. After treatment, there was a decrease in the elevated basal transepithelial voltage, and the normal response to a cAMP agonist was restored. We found no evidence of viral replication or virus-associated adverse effects, even at the highest dose tested (25 MOI). These data represent a small step in achieving long-term improvement of CF lung function by gene therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Student > Master 18 10%
Researcher 18 10%
Professor 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 51 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,640,190
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#5,229
of 17,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#387
of 22,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#3
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.