↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Human Cytomegalovirus Immediate-Early Gene Expression

Overview of attention for article published in Intervirology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 719)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulation of Human Cytomegalovirus Immediate-Early Gene Expression
Published in
Intervirology, July 2008
DOI 10.1159/000150504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey L. Meier, Mark F. Stinski

Abstract

The positive and negative cis-acting elements that affect transcription from the human cytomegalovirus major immediate-early (MIE) promoter and the viral and cellular proteins that bind to these elements are discussed. The data obtained using in vitro transcription and transient transfection assays are reviewed and compared to recent data using recombinant viruses with cis-acting elements deleted. The effects of cell type and cellular differentiation on activation of transcription from the MIE promoter are compared with the effects of mitogens and virion-associated tegument proteins that directly or indirectly activate protein kinase pathways. The repressor and enhancer regions upstream of the MIE promoter in the large unique component of the viral genome are compared to the elements upstream of the more simplified IEUS3 promoter in the short unique component of the viral genome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,771,623
of 30,539,290 outputs
Outputs from Intervirology
#23
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,769
of 114,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intervirology
#10
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,539,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.