↓ Skip to main content

Nucleation of crystals that are mixed composites of all three polymorphs in the Gaussian core model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Physics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nucleation of crystals that are mixed composites of all three polymorphs in the Gaussian core model
Published in
Journal of Chemical Physics, June 2015
DOI 10.1063/1.4922321
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present results of computer simulations of homogeneous crystal nucleation in the Gaussian core model. In our simulations, we study the competition between the body-centered-cubic (bcc), face-centered-cubic (fcc), and hexagonal-close-packed crystal phases. We find that the crystal nuclei that form from the metastable fluid phase are typically "mixed"; they do not consist of a single crystal polymorph. Furthermore, when the fcc phase is stable or fcc and bcc phases are equally stable, this mixed nature is found to persist far beyond the size at the top of the nucleation barrier, that is, far into what would be considered the growth (rather than nucleation) regime. In this region, the polymorph that forms is therefore selected long after nucleation. This has implications. When nucleation is slow, it will be the rate-limiting step for crystallization. Then, the step that determines the time scale for crystallisation is different from the step that controls which polymorph forms. This means that they can be independently controlled. Also between nucleation and polymorph selection, there is a growing phase that is clearly crystalline not fluid, but this phase cannot be assigned to any one polymorph.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Student > Master 4 25%
Professor 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 44%
Chemistry 3 19%
Chemical Engineering 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#28,633,246
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Physics
#17,475
of 24,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,779
of 306,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Physics
#135
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.