↓ Skip to main content

Inflammatory Chemokine Transport and Presentation in HEV

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Experimental Medicine, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inflammatory Chemokine Transport and Presentation in HEV
Published in
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, November 2001
DOI 10.1084/jem.194.9.1361
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Interstitial fluid is constantly drained into lymph nodes (LNs) via afferent lymph vessels. This conduit enables monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells to access LNs from peripheral tissues. We show that during inflammation in the skin, a second recruitment pathway is evoked that recruits large numbers of blood-borne monocytes to LNs via high endothelial venules (HEVs). Inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 blocked this inflammation-induced monocyte homing to LNs. MCP-1 mRNA in inflamed skin was over 100-fold upregulated and paralleled MCP-1 protein levels, whereas in draining LNs MCP-1 mRNA induction was much weaker and occurred only after a pronounced rise in MCP-1 protein. Thus, MCP-1 in draining LNs was primarily derived from inflamed skin. In MCP-1(-/-) mice, intracutaneously injected MCP-1 accumulated rapidly in the draining LNs where it enhanced monocyte recruitment. Intravital microscopy showed that skin-derived MCP-1 was transported via the lymph to the luminal surface of HEVs where it triggered integrin-dependent arrest of rolling monocytes. These findings demonstrate that inflamed peripheral tissues project their local chemokine profile to HEVs in draining LNs and thereby exert "remote control" over the composition of leukocyte populations that home to these organs from the blood.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 223 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 30%
Researcher 37 16%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 34 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#9,152,773
of 27,520,826 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#6,813
of 11,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,794
of 53,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#38
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,520,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.