↓ Skip to main content

Changes in the mouse ovarian surface epithelium with age and ovulation number

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular & Cellular Endocrinology, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Changes in the mouse ovarian surface epithelium with age and ovulation number
Published in
Molecular & Cellular Endocrinology, May 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0303-7207(02)00061-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

O.L. Clow, P.R. Hurst, J.S. Fleming

Abstract

The cell biology of ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) was studied in mice of varying age and lifetime total ovulation number (OV#), to determine the relative importance of these factors in control of OSE proliferation and development of invaginations and cysts. Ovaries from Swiss Webster mice (total OV# median: range [n mice]) were collected at 4 weeks of age (prepubertal; 0[9]), from 3-month virgins (113: 11-235 [55]), from 12-month old breeders (217: 97-386 [21]) and from 8-month virgin mice, housed in split cages alongside a male, to induce continuous oestrous cycles (629: 456-908 [16]). Scanning electron microscopy revealed cuboidal and squamous cells in OSE from all ages. Higher total OV# markedly increased the rate of OSE invagination and layering. Histology showed the incidence of cysts, which had the appearance of benign serous cystadenomata, increased with age rather than total OV#.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,581,964
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Molecular & Cellular Endocrinology
#707
of 3,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,983
of 177,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular & Cellular Endocrinology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.