↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recombination‐induced CAG trinucleotide repeat expansions in yeast involve the MRE11–RAD50–XRS2 complex
Published in
EMBO Journal, May 2000
DOI 10.1093/emboj/19.10.2381
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recombination induced by double-strand breaks (DSBs) in yeast leads to a higher proportion of expansions to contractions than does replication-associated tract length changes. Expansions are apparently dependent on the property of the repeat array to form hairpins, since DSB repair of a CAA(87) repeat induces only contractions of the repeat sequence. DSB-repair efficiency is reduced by 40% when DNA synthesis must traverse a CAG(98) array, as compared with a CAA(87) array. These data indicate that repair- associated DNA synthesis is inhibited by secondary structures formed by CAG(98) and that these structures promote repeat expansions during DSB repair. Overexpression of Mre11p or Rad50p suppresses the inhibition of DSB repair by CAG(98) and significantly increases the average size of expansions found at the recipient locus. Both effects are dependent on the integrity of the Mre11p-Rad50p-Xrs2p complex. The Mre11 complex thus appears to be directly involved in removing CAG or CTG hairpins that arise frequently during DNA synthesis accompanying gene conversion of these trinucleotide repeats.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 2 3%
Sweden 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,581,585
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Journal
#5,793
of 14,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 58,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Journal
#39
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.