↓ Skip to main content

Protective and therapeutic effect of DNA-based immunization against hepadnavirus large envelope protein

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Protective and therapeutic effect of DNA-based immunization against hepadnavirus large envelope protein
Published in
Gastroenterology, March 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70188-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Studies in the murine model suggest that injection of DNA encoding hepatitis B virus structural proteins is promising for the induction of a specific immune response. We used the duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) model to study the protective and therapeutic effects of naked DNA immunization against hepadnaviral large envelope protein. A pCI-preS/S plasmid expressing the DHBV large protein was used for intramuscular immunization of ducks. The humoral response was tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoblotting, neutralization, and in vivo protection tests. For DNA therapy, DHBV-carrier ducks received four injections of this plasmid. Viremia was monitored for 10 months; thereafter, liver biopsies were performed. Immunization with pCI-preS/S plasmid induced a specific, long-lasting, neutralizing, and highly protective anti-preS humoral response in uninfected animals. After pCI-preS/S treatment, a significant and sustained decrease in serum and liver DHBV DNA was observed for carrier ducks compared with the controls. DNA immunization against DHBV large protein results in a potent and protective anti-preS response in the duck model. The results of long-term follow-up of DNA-treated chronically infected ducks are promising and show the usefulness of this model for the study of genetic immunization in chronic hepatitis B therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Other 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2001.
All research outputs
#6,087,116
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#5,221
of 14,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,917
of 40,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#15
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.