↓ Skip to main content

Timing of treatment initiation for mild gestational diabetes mellitus and perinatal outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Timing of treatment initiation for mild gestational diabetes mellitus and perinatal outcomes
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Palatnik, Lisa Mele, Mark B. Landon, Uma M. Reddy, Susan M. Ramin, Marshall W. Carpenter, Ronald J. Wapner, Michael W. Varner, Dwight J. Rouse, John M. Thorp, Anthony Sciscione, Patrick Catalano, George R. Saade, Steve N. Caritis, Yoram Sorokin, A. Peaceman, P. Simon, G. Mallett, B. Casey, K. Leveno, L. Moseley, J. Gold, D. Bradford, L. Fay, M. Garcia, F. Capellan, M. Miodovnik, F. Malone, S. Bousleiman, H. Husami, V. Carmona, N. Fredericks, E. Gantioqui, B. Greenspan, M. Williams, K. Anderson, P. Ashby, S. McAllister, S. Quinn, F. Castinella, A. Guzman, J. Steiner, J. Parker, J. Sheppard, J. Tisdale, A. Northen, W. Andrews, D. Catlow, D. Allard, M. Seebeck, J. Tillinghast, J. Iams, F. Johnson, C. Latimer, E. Weinandy, B. Maselli, K. Dorman, S. Brody, S. Timlin, J. Bernhardt, M. Hoffman, E. Guzman, M. Talucci, T. Grossman, C. Perez, L. Zeghibe, P. Tabangin, B. Mercer, B. Stetzer, C. Milluzzi, W. Dalton, S. Pichette, M. Harper, M. Swain, P. Meis, J. White, L. Gilstrap, K. Cannon, J. Martinez, D. Dusek, J. Moss, J. Brandon, A. Jackson, G. Hankins, D. Sharp, M. Bickus, H. Birkland, M. Cotroneo, N. Cuddy, G. Norman, P. Lockhart, S. Blackwell, L. Quast, A. Peaceman, P. Simon, G. Mallett, J. Tolosa, L. Davis, E. Lairson, C. Cromett, C. Naze, M. Blaser, E. Thom, J. Zachary, B. Getachew, C. Cobb, L. Leuchtenburg, S. Gilbert, T. Spangler, C. Spong, S. Tolivaisa, K. Howell, G.D. Anderson

Abstract

To examine the association between gestational age (GA) at the time of treatment initiation for gestational diabetes (GDM) and maternal and perinatal outcomes. A secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized treatment trial of mild GDM in which women with mild GDM were randomized to treatment versus usual care. The primary outcome of the original trial, as well as this analysis, was a composite perinatal adverse outcome that included neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, hyperinsulinemia, and perinatal mortality. Other outcomes examined included the frequency of large for gestational age (LGA), birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICU), gestational hypertension / preeclampsia and cesarean delivery. The interaction between GA at treatment initiation (stratified as 24-26 weeks, 27 weeks, 28 weeks, 29 weeks, ≥30 weeks) and treatment group (treated vs. routine care), with the outcomes of interest, was used to determine whether GA at treatment initiation was associated with outcome differences. Of 958 women analyzed, those who initiated treatment at an earlier GA did not gain an additional treatment benefit compared to those who initiated treatment at a later GA (p-value for interaction with the primary outcome is 0.44). Similarly, there was no evidence that other outcomes were significantly improved by earlier initiation of GDM treatment (LGA p=0.76; NICU admission p=0.8; cesarean delivery p=0.82). The only outcome that had a significant interaction between GA and treatment was gestational hypertension/preeclampsia (p=0.04), although there was not a clear cut GA trend where this outcome improved with treatment. Earlier initiation of treatment of mild GDM was not associated with stronger effect of treatment on perinatal outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 15 9%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 67 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 73 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2026.
All research outputs
#9,680,754
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#8,487
of 17,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,387
of 307,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#89
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.