↓ Skip to main content

Fingertip contact influences human postural control

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, August 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fingertip contact influences human postural control
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, August 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02738408
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Touch and pressure stimulation of the body surface can strongly influence apparent body orientation, as well as the maintenance of upright posture during quiet stance. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between postural sway and contact forces at the fingertip while subjects touched a rigid metal bar. Subjects were tested in the tandem Romberg stance with eyes open or closed under three conditions of fingertip contact: no contact, touch contact (< 0.98 N of force), and force contact (as much force as desired). Touch contact was as effective as force contact or sight of the surroundings in reducing postural sway when compared to the no contact, eyes closed condition. Body sway and fingertip forces were essentially in phase with force contact, suggesting that fingertip contact forces are physically counteracting body sway. Time delays between body sway and fingertip forces were much larger with light touch contact, suggesting that the fingertip is providing information that allows anticipatory innervation of musculature to reduce body sway. The results are related to observations on precision grip as well as the somatosensory, proprioceptive, and motor mechanisms involved in the reduction of body sway.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Japan 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Slovenia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 60 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 12 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Sports and Recreations 14 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Engineering 7 10%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2026.
All research outputs
#21,532,239
of 32,797,349 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,278
of 4,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,148
of 29,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,797,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.