↓ Skip to main content

The role of elicited verbal imitation in toddlers’ word learning*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Language, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The role of elicited verbal imitation in toddlers’ word learning*
Published in
Journal of Child Language, June 2015
DOI 10.1017/s0305000915000240
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study is about the role of elicited verbal imitation in toddler word learning. Forty-eight toddlers were taught eight nonwords linked to referents. During training, they were asked to imitate the nonwords. Naming of the referents was tested at three intervals (one minute later [uncued], five minutes, and 1-7 days later [cued]) and recognition at the last two intervals. Receptive vocabulary, nonword repetition, and expressive phonology were assessed. The accuracy of elicited imitation during training predicted naming at one and five minutes, but not 1-7 days later. Neither nonword repetition nor expressive phonology was associated with naming over time but extant vocabulary predicted performance at all time intervals. We hypothesize that elicited imitation facilitates word learning in its earliest stages by supporting encoding of the word form into memory and allowing practice of the articulatory-phonological plan. At later stages, vocabulary facilitates integration of the word form into the lexical network.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Linguistics 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%