↓ Skip to main content

Gene Therapy for Endometrial Carcinoma with the Herpes Simplex Thymidine Kinase Gene

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecologic Oncology, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gene Therapy for Endometrial Carcinoma with the Herpes Simplex Thymidine Kinase Gene
Published in
Gynecologic Oncology, March 2000
DOI 10.1006/gyno.1999.5707
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We investigated whether retrovirus-mediated transfer of the herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene into a human endometrial carcinoma (EC4) cell line can sensitize these cells to the prodrug ganciclovir (GCV) and thereby provide a therapeutic option for this cancer. A retrovirus encoding for the herpes simplex virus tip-1 (HSV) thymidine kinase (tk) gene was generated in which expression of tk is under control of the myeloproliferative sarcoma virus (MPSV) promoter/enhancer. We used human mutated dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) cDNA as a selectable marker. Expression of tk was confirmed by Northern blot analysis and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We demonstrated that the combination of retrovirally mediated tk gene transfer and GCV treatment effectively inhibits proliferation and causes death of EC4 cells in vitro. A bystander killing effect was observed when 90% of uninfected tumor cells were mixed with only 10% of HSVtk-infected cells. We suggest that a gene therapy approach to endometrial carcinoma can be established using retroviral transfer of HSVtk to tumor cells and subsequent administration of GCV.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Neuroscience 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2009.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology
#2,631
of 6,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,457
of 47,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.