↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High concentration versus incremental induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane in children: A comparison of induction times, vital signs, and complications
Published in
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, February 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00218-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To compare sevoflurane induction times and complications in children during a high concentration, primed-circuit method and an incremental induction technique. Randomized, prospective open-label study. Academic university hospital. 40 unpremedicated ASA physical status I and II children age 4 months to 15 years undergoing elective surgical procedures with general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to one of two study groups. In the high concentration group, the anesthesia circuit was primed with 8% sevoflurane in a 2:1 nitrous oxide:oxygen (N2O:O2) mixture. Patients breathed this gas mixture spontaneously until loss of the eyelash reflex. In the incremental group, the face mask was applied and 1% sevoflurane in a 2:1 N2O:O2 mixture was administered. In this group, the sevoflurane concentration was increased by 1% every 2 to 3 breaths. Gas flows of 6 L/min were administered to both groups during the study period. Following loss of the eyelash reflex, the sevoflurane concentration was decreased to 5% until a depth of anesthesia sufficient to start an intravenous catheter was achieved. Induction cooperation, induction time (face mask application to loss of the eyelash reflex), one-minute vital signs [blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry (SpO2)], induction complications. Induction of anesthesia was faster in the high concentration group than in the incremental group (mean (SD) 42 (9) sec vs. 66 (12) sec, respectively; p < 0.001). Induction complications were minor and occurred with similar frequencies (4/20 patients vs. 3/20 patients). There were no significant intergroup heart rate, blood pressure, or SpO2 differences during induction. No patients required treatment for hypotension or bradycardia. In healthy pediatric patients undergoing mask induction of general anesthesia with sevoflurane, the induction time can be significantly shortened without an increase in the frequency of airway or vital sign complications using a high concentration, primed circuit technique compared with a conventional, incremental induction method.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Lecturer 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 8 29%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 68%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2009.
All research outputs
#9,515,649
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#606
of 2,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,481
of 102,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them