↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
47 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anti‐CD3‐based bispecific antibody designed for therapy of human B‐cell malignancy can induce T‐cell activation by antigen‐dependent and antigen‐independent mechanisms
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, December 1998
DOI 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980717)77:2<251::aid-ijc14>3.0.co;2-e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anti-CD3 x anti-B-cell antigen bispecific monoclonal antibodies (bsAbs) can redirect T-cell-mediated lysis toward malignant B cells. Clinical trials with CD3-based bsAbs have shown toxicity in patients which is likely related to nonspecific T-cell activation and targeting. Our current studies were designed to explore the mechanisms responsible for the observed in vivo toxicity by evaluating the immunologic effects of 2 different bsAb preparations in vitro. 1D10 was used as the tumor specific arm of the bsAbs. This antibody reacts with a variant of HLA-DR found on a majority of pre-B- and B-cell malignancies, and normal B cells in some individuals. Anti-CD3 served as the T-cell specific arm. A 1D10 x anti-CD3 bispecific IgG (bsIgG) produced using the hybrid-hybridoma method was compared to a 1D10 x anti-CD3 bispecific F(ab')2 [bsF(ab')2] produced using the leucine zipper technique. In cytotoxicity assays, both bsIgG and bsF(ab')2 induced lysis by pre-activated T cells of 1D10 (+) malignant B cells. bsIgG at high concentrations also induced lysis of 1D10 (-) tumor cells, while bsF(ab')2 did not. Proliferation of T cells induced by bsIgG and bsF(ab')2 was also evaluated. Both forms of bsAbs induced T-cell proliferation in the presence of antigen (+) Raji cells, while only bsIgG did so in the presence of antigen (-) malignant B cells. bsF(ab')2 induced T-cell activation in the absence of any tumor cells when testing was performed on samples where the 1D10 target antigen was present on normal peripheral blood B cells. We conclude that non-specific T-cell activation from bsAbs can occur in an antigen-independent manner due to the Fc/Fc receptor (FcR) interaction, or in an antigen-dependent manner when antigen is expressed on normal or tumor cells. Both mechanisms may have been responsible for the toxicity observed in prior clinical studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 16%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#3,484,416
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#1,451
of 13,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,561
of 145,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#32
of 900 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 900 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.