↓ Skip to main content

Photoreceptor differentiation of isolated retinal precursor cells includes the capacity for photomechanical responses.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Photoreceptor differentiation of isolated retinal precursor cells includes the capacity for photomechanical responses.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1993
DOI 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1982
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Isolated retinal precursor cells, grown without pigment epithelial or glial cells and in the absence of intercellular contacts, develop a complex set of photoreceptor-specific properties, including polarized structural and molecular organization and opsin immunoreactivity. We report here that these isolated embryonic photoreceptors are also capable of responding to light. Sequential photography showed that 50% of the photoreceptors grown in a light cycle elongate when exposed to light and contract in response to darkness. A smaller population (20%) showed the opposite response. Responses of individual cells could be observed during several sequential light cycles and resemble photomechanical movements in vivo [Ali, M. A. (1971) Vision Res. 11, 1225-1288]. The differentiation program expressed by isolated precursor cells, therefore, includes the capacity for highly complex functional activities that require light sensitivity. These observations raise challenging questions regarding the nature of the chromophore and pigments that mediate light-regulated behaviors of cultured photoreceptors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 56%
Engineering 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2010.
All research outputs
#12,425,845
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83,878
of 119,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,474
of 29,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#299
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.