↓ Skip to main content

Seizure Suppression in Kindled Rats by Intraventricular Grafting of an Adenosine Releasing Synthetic Polymer

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Neurology, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Seizure Suppression in Kindled Rats by Intraventricular Grafting of an Adenosine Releasing Synthetic Polymer
Published in
Experimental Neurology, November 1999
DOI 10.1006/exnr.1999.7209
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adenosine, an endogenous inhibitory neuromodulator in the central nervous system, exerts anticonvulsant activity that is largely based on the inhibition of the release of excitatory amino acids. As a novel approach to treat pharmacoresistant partial epilepsies, the grafting of adenosine-releasing cells is foreseen to provide a local and sustained source of adenosine. The feasibility of this cell-based therapy was investigated in the present study by the intraventricular implantation of synthetic polymers that release adenosine. Kindled rats with a ventricular implant of an adenosine-releasing polymer showed a profound reduction of seizure activity. This was demonstrated not only by a 75% reduction of grade 5 seizures but also by a reduction of the amplitude and duration of afterdischarges in electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. Kindled control rats that were implanted with bovine serum albumin (BSA)-containing polymers or were sham operated, continued to show their presurgery seizure pattern. Adenosine displayed antiepileptic activity when released in an amount of 20-50 ng per day. This finding sets the target for the required amount of adenosine to be released from future adenosine-releasing cells for antiepileptic therapy. The present results clearly support the feasibility of a novel therapy for epilepsy based on adenosine-releasing cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 31%
Neuroscience 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Neurology
#1,465
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,935
of 40,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Neurology
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.