We present an analysis of physical chemical constraints on the accuracy of DNA micro-arrays under equilibrium and nonequilibrium conditions. At the beginning of the article we describe an algorithm for choosing a probe set with high specificity for targeted genes under equilibrium conditions. The algorithm as well as existing methods is used to select probes from the full Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, and these probe sets, along with a randomly selected set, are used to simulate array experiments and identify sources of error. Inasmuch as specificity and sensitivity are maximum at thermodynamic equilibrium, we are particularly interested in the factors that affect the approach to equilibrium. These are analyzed later in the article, where we develop and apply a rapidly executable method to simulate the kinetics of hybridization on a solid phase support. Although the difference between solution phase and solid phase hybridization is of little consequence for specificity and sensitivity when equilibrium is achieved, the kinetics of hybridization has a pronounced effect on both. We first use the model to estimate the effects of diffusion, crosshybridization, relaxation time, and target concentration on the hybridization kinetics, and then investigate the effects of the most important kinetic parameters on specificity. We find even when using probe sets that have high specificity at equilibrium that substantial crosshybridization is present under nonequilibrium conditions. Although those complexes that differ from perfect complementarity by more than a single base do not contribute to sources of error at equilibrium, they slow the approach to equilibrium dramatically and confound interpretation of the data when they dissociate on a time scale comparable to the time of the experiment. For the best probe set, our simulation shows that steady-state behavior is obtained in a relaxation time of approximately 12-15 h for experimental target concentrations approximately (10(-13) - 10(-14))M, but the time is greater for lower target concentrations in the range (10(-15)-10(-16))M. The result points to an asymmetry in the accuracy with which up- and downregulated genes are identified.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Journal
#3,254
of 10,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,675
of 136,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Journal
#16
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
