↓ Skip to main content

The Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Glycoprotein E (gE) Mediates IgG Binding and Cell-to-Cell Spread through Distinct gE Domains

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Glycoprotein E (gE) Mediates IgG Binding and Cell-to-Cell Spread through Distinct gE Domains
Published in
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, June 1997
DOI 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6720
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein E (gE) is a multifunctional protein capable of both binding the Fc portion of IgG and mediating cell-to-cell spread of HSV-1. Here we report that the domain on gE involved in IgG binding is distinct from the domain involved in mediating cell-to-cell spread. To do this we have used five mutants of the HSV-1 strain NS: NS-gE(null), a gE deletion virus; rNS-gE(null), a gE rescued virus; NS-gE339, a gE mutant virus with a four amino acid insert at position 339; rNS-gE339, a gE rescue of NS-gE339; and NS-gE406, a gE mutant virus with the same four amino acids inserted at position 406. Using IgG coated sheep red blood cells in rosetting assays, we show that the NS-gE339 does not bind IgG, yet retains the ability to mediate normal cell-to-cell spread. These results demonstrate that the gE domain involved in IgG binding differs from the domain involved in cell-to-cell spread.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2026.
All research outputs
#7,581,873
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#6,184
of 33,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,212
of 42,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#55
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.