↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
307 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
883 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-0902-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quan Liu, Ze-Dong Wang, Si-Yang Huang, Xing-Quan Zhu

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis, caused by the obligate intracellular protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, is an important zoonosis with medical and veterinary importance worldwide. The disease is mainly contracted by ingesting undercooked or raw meat containing viable tissue cysts, or by ingesting food or water contaminated with oocysts. The diagnosis and genetic characterization of T. gondii infection is crucial for the surveillance, prevention and control of toxoplasmosis. Traditional approaches for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis include etiological, immunological and imaging techniques. Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis has been improved by the emergence of molecular technologies to amplify parasite nucleic acids. Among these, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular techniques have been useful for the genetic characterization of T. gondii. Serotyping methods based on polymorphic polypeptides have the potential to become the choice for typing T. gondii in humans and animals. In this review, we summarize conventional non-DNA-based diagnostic methods, and the DNA-based molecular techniques for the diagnosis and genetic characterization of T. gondii. These techniques have provided foundations for further development of more effective and accurate detection of T. gondii infection. These advances will contribute to an improved understanding of the epidemiology, prevention and control of toxoplasmosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 883 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 879 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 157 18%
Student > Master 114 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 9%
Researcher 56 6%
Other 40 5%
Other 136 15%
Unknown 298 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 93 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 92 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 62 7%
Other 86 10%
Unknown 314 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,397,030
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#461
of 5,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,390
of 267,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#7
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.